Sir William Jones, the earlier opinion of Lord Holt (Coggs v. Bernard, 92 Eng. Rep. 107 (K.B 1704) divided the bonds into five types, namely: Gratuitous Bailee:A bailee that looks after the leasehold property without compensation and does not benefit from the lease relationship. However, if the leaseee saves the property on its own, the Bailor has the right to bring a transformational action against the third person. Sub-bayil can be detrimental to the sub-bayile, as some of the conditions agreed between Bailee and Subbailevereinbart may increase liability. The obligations of a free bailee arise from the handing over of the property. They are responsible for the loss of property if the damage is caused by the serious negligence of the lease. A blow to the parties occurs when an exchange of benefits takes place between the parties (for example. B a repair for repairing a thing if the owner pays for repair of the repair). A lease gives rise to a number of Bailee`s obligations to the Bailee: lease is different from a sale contract or a donation of the property, since it is only a transfer of ownership and not its property. To create a lease, both the bailee must intend to own the leaseable and physically own it. Although a bailment relationship is generally contractually established, there are circumstances in which the legitimate ownership of the leaseee creates a leasement relationship without an ordinary contract[2], such as.
B an involuntary derailment. A bailment relationship between the Bailor and the Bailee is generally less formal than a fiduciary relationship. [2] If a transaction involves a transfer of ownership, the right to return the property to the Bailor does not depend on the terms of the agreement (explicit or tacit) between the parties when the property was first saved. Regardless of whether the goods are saved free of charge or not, the Bailor has a duty to disclose all known errors on the property presented to the Bailee. Otherwise, the Bailor would be liable for compensating the bailee for any damage directly caused to it by this fault. It should be noted, however, that in the event of a free softening, the Bailor is also responsible for errors that it is not aware of. If the bailee contradicts the contract as it sells or offers to sell the property to a third party, the termination will end. Regardless of the beneficiaries of the derailment and the maintenance standard that the leaseee must use, all bailees are strictly liable when it comes to returning the property to the true owner.
Therefore, if the leaseee delivers the property incorrectly, it is held liable, even if it is best used as due diligence. For example, there must be a purpose for the delivery of the goods. If, after the objective of the derailment has been achieved, the property is not taken into account, then no derailments can occur. This is an important feature because it separates it from other relationships such as the agency, etc. A common example of the derailment is that you leave your car with a valet. However, leaving a car in an unattended car park is usually a rental contract or license for a car park and not an intrusion, because the garage is not supported (i.e..
Komentáře